Sunday, September 29, 2013

TOW #3: Article (Fed Too Familiar With Lost Labor Seeking New Message for Policy)

Caroline Salas Gage, author of "Fed Too Familiar With Lost Labor Seeking New Messages for Policy," has written for Bloomberg Businessweek since at least July 2011, making her a relatively credible source. The article was written in response to the Federal Reserve's decision to rely less upon the national unemployment rate as a measure of economic success. Gage tries to persuade readers that the Federal Reserve made a mistake in choosing the unemployment rate as an indicator of the current economy and guideline for policy-making. Gage appeals to logos frequently by writing statistics into every paragraph, quoting numbers such as the unemployment rate of each month this summer from June to August (7.6%, 7.4%, and 7.3%) and the Federal Open Market Committee's bond-buying rate ($85 billion per month). She also quotes experts on the article's topic, making sure to establish their ethos through a proper introduction. For example, she quoted Ethan Harris, "co-head of global economics research at Bank of America Corp. in New York." I'm not sure if this next tool has a specific literary term, but videos of several speeches that she mentions can be found on the side of the article, giving the reader extra context if they feel they need it.

I chose this article specifically because I thought it would be boring, and I was correct. I'm sure its intended audience of business-minded BusinessWeek readers take away exactly what Gage intended, but I personally didn't care and was more than a bit lost. Her typical audience would have a frame of reference for the statistics that Gage was so fond of including, but I would have needed them to be thoroughly explained. I think even the common person would have difficulty understanding the article; only a businessperson would really understand and care about her message. That being said, she seems to argue and support her point well.


According to BusinessWeek, this is Ben S. Bernanke, Chairman of the Federal Reserve.
I'll take their word for it.


http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-09-29/fed-too-familiar-with-lost-labor-seeking-new-message-for-policy.html

Sunday, September 22, 2013

TOW #2: Visual Text (Progresso Commercial)




This commercial was first aired in 2009, though I believe it still airs occasionally. Weight Watchers had recently partnered with Progresso to make a slightly more healthy soup that would fit in the Weight Watchers diet. As is the goal of any advertisement, Progresso's purpose in producing this commercial was to sell more of its soup.

The commercial follows the typical format of the Progresso commercial; a chef is working in the kitchen when a distressed customer calls over the can phone and complains about some sort of problem they have that is caused by Progresso soups' excessive superiority. Because Progresso is already well-known for marketing in this way, the advertisement is easily recognizable, allowing the audience to focus on the specific product because tit already knows the brand.

In a span of thirty seconds, the commercial appeals to ethos, pathos, and logos. Due to the formatting of the commercial, ethos receives a slightly unconventional appeal. Progresso wrote and produced every part of the video, but created a relatable character to speak as though she were an actual consumer, showing how much "real" people enjoy Progresso products. This woman caters specifically to the target audience, which consists of middle-aged women who have families, shop for groceries, and would like to lose a bit of weight.
She makes us laugh at her husband's expense: a slight appeal to pathos. An appeal to logos is cleverly slipped in without being explicitly stated. The main character makes the claim that those who eat Progresso's Weight Watchers-endorsed soups will begin to look like they did twenty years ago.

I believe Progresso's purpose was well achieved. The few seconds of humor with the husband allows viewers to see the commercial many times before getting bored and changing the channel, and more views leads to more product purchases.

Sunday, September 15, 2013

TOW #1: Article (Want to See China's Latest Top Secret Military Site? Just Google It)

On September 14, Time Magazine published Dan Kedmey's article, "Want to See China's Latest Top Secret Military Site? Just Google It." Kedmey appears to have written for Time since June 5 of this year, but that's all the information that can be found. His article topics have ranged from North Korea to internet in the Pacific Islands to One Direction. His only credit is that he has been consistently published in Time Magazine for a few months. This is the first strike against the article.

Kedmey begins by comparing the use of spies and satellite pictures during the Cold War to the Google Earth images of military intelligence we can access today. The comparison effectively shows how current technology far surpasses anything we have had throughout history. He explains that Peter Singer and Jeremy Lin, two military technology enthusiasts (experts?), wrote an analysis of the production of the first Chinese military aircraft carrier based solely on images found on public blogs. The reader learns more about the analysis and the current technology available to us, then is stuck with five hundred words of background information about Jeremy Lin and the online military forums he uses. Kedmey offers some information about the internet's ability to find and interpret confidential information, but focuses mainly on Lin, calling him a "digital-age Pocahontas, who could lead old-school intelligence experts through the unfamiliar terrain of crowd-sourced pictures." The allusion, in addition to going into far too much detail about a man the reader doesn't care about, is also inaccurate: Kedmey likely meant to compare Lin to Sacagawea. Strike two.

Fortunately, the article does not receive a third strike; it was neither fantastic nor awful. Kedmey's goal was to show the readers of Time Magazine the shocking ease with which military intelligence can be leaked. However, I believe he should have further explained the significance of this availability of information. In his final paragraphs, he quickly describes the CIA's center for open source intelligence, to which the general public submits information to be reviewed as possible evidence in threat assessments. Had he included more of this type of information and less on the background of the barely relevant military enthusiast, this article would have more impact on its readers.


Aircraft Carrier Production
The top secret Chinese aircraft carrier isn't so secret after all.


http://world.time.com/2013/09/14/wanna-see-chinas-latest-top-secret-military-site-just-google-it/

IRB #1: Outliers

Malcolm Gladwell's Outliers describes people who have gained overwhelming success and highlights the specific circumstances that allowed them to get there. Among others, Gladwell discusses the rise of Bill Gates and The Beatles. He explains why a disproportionate number of successful hockey players are born in the early months of the year. (Hint: Training starts at a young age.) The novel as a whole explains how certain people rise above others who may be just as talented.

I have recently realized that popular books usually become popular because they are valuable and worthwhile. Outliers falls in this category. The book is fairly well-known and has been recommended to me many times over the past two years. I usually prefer narrative nonfiction, but decided to try this one just because others have done the same. I hope to discover why so many people have enjoyed it, and am curious to see whether I'll enjoy it as well.





Monday, September 2, 2013

A Personal Essay by a Personal Essay

By Christy Vannoy


Vannoy is a columnist for McSweeney’s, an online magazine of sorts, which is where she first published this piece in 2011. “A Personal Essay by a Personal Essay” is by far the lightest and shortest essay in the collection. Vannoy wrote it as to criticize the competitive world of writing essays. Her narrator is an actual personal essay: one of ten being competitively considered for a magazine. The author writes, “The Essay Without Arms worried me at first, but she had great bone structure and a wedding ring dangled from a chain around her neck, so I doubted her life has been all that hard” (210). Vannoy’s use of satire borders on open mocking of the melodramatic nature of many essays. She implies that it’s nearly mandatory for a personal essay to be equal parts tragic and inspiring. Vannoy particularly utilizes humor in her exaggerated descriptions of typical essays, including one that followed “a series of miscarriages and narcoleptic seizures living in a work camp […] in communist China” (211). She realizes this is hyperbole, but uses it to highlight the trend in personal essays about grief and suffering.

Essayists and essay readers alike would enjoy Vannoy’s critique of the industry. She fulfills her purpose so well that the reader begins to reflect on the other essays in the same collection. There’s a woman hit by a bus, a risky 1960’s abortion, a mugging, a string of murders… The most popular essays, as Vannoy suggests, seem to highlight the misfortune of the author. Are we sadists? Vannoy’s narrator offers advice to other personal essays that might explain our love of hardship. The author writes, “You are not a tragedy, you are a personal essay. You must rise above and you must do it in the last paragraph with basic grammar and easily recognized words” (212). For an essay to be enjoyable (and therefore popular) it must leave the reader with some lesson or emotion; there is seldom a better takeaway than a protagonist’s triumph over stacked odds.


The Drama!
Vannoy satirizes the trend in unfortunate and dramatic personal essays.